Apple’s Legal Victory Matters For Everyone…

Share

Apple’s apparent victory in their patent Infringement lawsuit against Samsung is really a victory for the entire mobile industry.  

Outside of Microsoft’s efforts around Windows 8, the rest of the marketplace as been settling into developing ‘iPhone like’ devices with marginally differentiating features or form factors.  There hasn’t been any significant innovation taking place here recently, and Apple hasn’t really come under any pressure to do more than marginal improvements these past few years to iOS, their mobile operating platform.

If this ruling is upheld through whatever remaining legal appeals Samsung has available, it will probably force a fundamental rethink of how platform developers decide to compete in the mobile space – especially Google with their Android Operating system. 

I’m hoping – maybe foolishly – that this might be a real inflection point, where radically different, truly unique, and even somewhat crazy ideas get considered, selected, and ultimately refined into new types of products, platforms, and environments.  The mobile market desperately needs real diversity in the approaches that vendors are taking today. That is one of the best ways to generate the kind of competition that drives everyone to innovate and deliver excellence.

Competition like that can end up fueling the long-term health of the industry.  This may just be the catalyst that makes that happen.

When all is said and done, Apple may be none too happy to find that there are far more innovative thinkers with incredible ideas in the market than they ever imagined.  But having that happen would be great for everyone.  

Even Apple and Samsung.

For more details, catch the NY Times article here.

Microsoft Needs To Cut The Cord…

Share

Although the iPad is my device of choice for “relaxation centric” computing, I also use it as a serious productivity tool when I’m working.


In fact, most of my web research, e-communications, task management, and note-taking happens with my iPad. I now use my Mac mostly for more demanding things like video/media work, or when I need to do a lot of long-form typing or page layout projects.

This means that I am on a constant search for top-notch iPad apps that can support the range of things I want to use it for. And while I am fully committed to the overall Apple ecosystem – Mac, iPad and iPhone – there is one Windows application that I always wished had an equivalent Apple based implementation – especially on the iPad.

Microsoft’s OneNote.

So why was a dedicated Apple geek like me waiting for a Microsoft application to port over to iOS?

A little history is in order… I have been looking for a satisfying, functional tablet form factor since people first started building any gadget even remotely similar to one. This started with PDA’s like the Newton and Palm, and eventually progressed to a Windows Tablet PC. And that is when I became a big fan of OneNote.

Around 5 years ago, I decided to give the Motion Computing Tablet computer a try. It was expensive and bulky, but seemed to be heading in the right direction. I had also seen a demo of the OneNote application that was bundled with it, and it seemed to be a perfect fit for the kinds of note taking/mind mapping things I envisioned doing with it.

Unfortunately, things didn’t work out as I had hoped. While the hardware was close (at least for its time), the whole Windows Tablet OS experience was just a disaster. As much as I tried, the Windows Tablet approach was simply unworkable for me as a general productivity platform, and I eventually gave up on it.

But I did maintain an appreciation for OneNote – the one bright spot of that experience.

Of course, not too long after that, the iPad came along and was finally able to deliver the tablet experience I had been searching for since the early Palm days. It quickly became a core piece of my productivity toolkit, and from that point, I shifted my focus to finding and integrating the best applications available for it that could integrate with my workflow.

Fast Forward to now…

I have to admit that I was both surprised and excited last week when Microsoft announced that they had finally released a version of OneNote for the iPad. Combining the core OneNote functionality I remembered with the iOS touch interface and iPad form factor seemed like an easy win for Microsoft (and a great way for them to validate their own upcoming tablet efforts). I was really thrilled that they decided to make the port.

Well – at least until I installed it.

A "Functionality Bare" Version of OneNote

The iPad version of OneNote comes with just one notebook, and won’t let you create any new ones, or even add new pages to the one it comes with. What Microsoft ended up doing was creating a feature limited version of OneNote that can really only function as a satellite interface to OneNote for Windows. You are supposed to create your notebooks and pages in the Windows version of the product and sync them over to the iPad via Microsoft’s SkyDrive.

What a disappointment.

At the end of the day, there was no technical or experiential reason why Microsoft needed to cripple OneNote for iPad in this way and tie it to their Windows/Office versions. There was only a business reason for doing this. Unfortunately, by trying to develop a product that would please their accountants and investors, they ended up alienating what might be a far more important segment of the marketplace – the early adopters who could help them transition away from their dependency on legacy product lines. I wouldn’t be surprised if this approach ends up becoming a theme that Microsoft adopts with both Windows 8 and their mobile/tablet efforts – deprecating any version of a new product that may threaten one of their franchise revenue streams – effectively undermining their future to try and protect their past.

Ultimately, Microsoft needs to come to terms with the shifts that are already happening in the PC marketplace, namely that desktop computing (and more specifically mouse/keyboard computing) is being supplanted by mobile and embedded computing alternatives, and that high priced OS and application franchises are quickly being eroded by low cost or free alternatives. The more effort Microsoft invests in propping up their old products and unsustainable business models, the less relevant they will ultimately be going forward. It’s time for them to cut the cord with the past, and envision what a post-Windows, post-Office Suite world will look like.

Their customers and competitors already are…

Windows 8: Microsoft Needs To Deliver – For Real…

Share

Microsoft has always been able to pull together great demos of pre-released products. Unfortunately, many of the most exiting features from those demos never seem to make it into the released versions of their products. Here is the most recent demo of their upcoming Windows 8 release for CES 2012:

‘Over promising’ isn’t something Microsoft can have happen with the release of Windows 8. Microsoft is playing catch-up on a lot of fronts – especially in the mobile arena – and needs to seriously ‘over deliver’ if they have a chance of grabbing some market share. With Windows 8 not slated to come out until the later half of 2012, there will be a lot of innovation that takes place on both the Android and iOS platforms before it arrives. What they offer will need to standup to comparison with both of these established players on every front: interface, features, stability, and applications.

Not an easy task by any measure.

Microsoft will also have a very small window to make headway and establish credibility in the tablet space. Apple will probably be releasing their iPad 4 (two full generations of the tablet from what is available today) in the beginning of 2013 – grabbing the media spotlight with rumors long before it eventually rolls out.

If what they are demoing here can make it on to lightweight tablets devices with true ‘all day’ battery life and price points starting at or below $500, they have a chance of success – especially if they can leverage their Office franchise as a differentiator.

If instead it turns out to be a bloated OS running on $1000 hardware with a laptop level battery life, they will be dead on arrival.

At this point, my money isn’t on Microsoft.

Windows Phone 7: Quick Thoughts…

Share

Microsoft’s has been struggling for several years to unhook their mobile strategy from their previous “Windows Mobile” initiative, and effectively reinvent their footprint in this space. This week, they took what I hope is just a first step down a new mobile path with the launch of Windows Phone 7.

Unlike Apple’s iPhone or most of the Android phones I’ve seen, Windows Phone 7 is not an “App Centric” device. It presents an interface built around ‘information tiles’ that provide a composite/mosaic view of the things that are going on around you. The following video offers a good overview of this design:

While I applaud Microsoft for actually trying to forge their own path in this space, I do have several concerns about the approach they have taken:

  • Easy access to applications is an important aspect of mobile computing. In the mobile world, applications are replacing generalized search for many uses, and easy access to both productivity and entertainment tools is important to many people. In its current ‘first release’ version, Windows Phone 7 seems to provide a less direct way for people to access its applications – a real limitation in my opinion.
  • Having used the iPad since it first came on the market, I can attest to the importance of the tablet form factor to mobile productivity. While I have no doubt that Microsoft understands this as well as anybody, I am not sure they are willing to abandon their Windows based focused in going after this market. I have yet to hear any mention of a “Windows Slate 7″ version of this platform in the works, which concerns me. The mobile and full size computing experiences are fundamentally distinct, and Microsoft’s entire mobile strategy should be built around a single mobile-centric OS platform – not a stripped down Windows hybrid. We’ll need to see where Microsoft and it’s hardware partners go with this.
  • As Apple has shown, success in mobile requires not just great software and hardware, but the evolution of an entire ecosystem to support it. This is not something Microsoft can simply farm out to their hardware partners. They need to own it and focus on it. Unfortunately, this is not an area that Microsoft hasn’t been strong in historically, and I haven’t gotten a clear picture of their plan for developing this.

I am looking forward to seeing how Microsoft evolves this platform. There are clearly some well thought out aspects to Windows Phone 7 that are not (yet) available on competing platforms, and also some parts that seem to have received a lot less attention. That said, you really can’t judge what the ultimate impact of Phone 7 may be based on what we are seeing now. What will matter is how quickly Microsoft evolves the platform over the next year, and the strength of the ecosystem they are able to build around it.

For Microsoft’s long term prospects, this is far more important than the release of Windows 7. The success or failure of the Windows Phone 7 platform will define the impact Microsoft gets to have on the next major generation of personal computing.

The Blurring Of Corporate IT…

Share

It wasn’t that long ago that most of the computer technology used by people was provided by their employers. It started out being desktop systems physically located at their offices. Everything installed on these computers was work related. They connected to corporate services via an internal network, and accessed the internet in a controlled way through corporate firewalls.

As the workplace became more distributed and mobile, computing shifted over more to laptops. Since these systems were with people all the time, they started to get used for both work and personal things. Access to the internet became open, with people connecting via their home networks and public hot spots. To accommodate these mobile workers, internal corporate systems started shifting to browser based interfaces, letting them access these systems via secure connections back to the corporate network. Many corporations also supplied phones to these mobile workers – typically RIM Blackberries – to let them make calls and access email. In total, it was a fairly complete set of corporate sponsored tools.

But then a few interesting things happened:

  • Laptop prices dropped dramatically, fueled in part by the popularity of very low cost netbooks.
  • Apple introduced the iPhone and AppStore.
  • Social networking tools became a popular way to communicate.
  • Free, cloud based services expanded the range of capabilities available to people.

As laptop prices fell, people started to purchase their own systems to use. Some wanted to use MacBooks instead of corporate provided windows systems. Others wanted systems that had specific features or form factors not offered by their organizations. Instead of finding ways to squeeze the applications and services they personally wanted onto the systems supplied by their companies, these users flipped the model – looking at ways to integrate what they needed to do for work onto their personal systems.

The introduction of the iPhone continued the push away from corporate sponsored systems. The iPhone was the first mobile phone to offer a real browser, and people quickly gravitated to the promise of having the real internet available on something they could slip in their pocket. Despite little initial interest by IT departments to support the iPhone, people simply bought their own and used them for both work and personal needs. The introduction of the App Store a year later cemented the iPhone as a true mobile productivity platform, making it the smartphone everyone wanted to have.

Along side these developments, social networking started to grow in importance as a viable channel for people to communicate across. This led to more sophisticated social applications appearing – both on mobile platforms as well as PC’s – making social networking a practical tool for professional users as well as consumers. However, outside of cost saving tools like Skype, corporations have typically been slow to bring social applications into the sponsored fold.

Also during this period, cloud based applications started growing in both popularity and sophistication. Beyond the free emails services that had been popular for many years, this generation of cloud based services covered everything from comprehensive office productivity applications to services like CRM systems, cloud based disk storage, and even cloud hosted databases. Most were free or very low cost, and didn’t require technical sophistication on the part of users.

Collectively, these developments have had a real impact on the way employees view their corporate IT services, and where their expectations are now set.

People can now afford to buy their own equipment, and are comfortable using all of these tools on their own. There are now free or inexpensive applications and services available to these people that cover all the capabilities of their traditionally IT sponsored equivalents. There are also applications that people use on their own – like social networking – that aren’t yet being considered by most organizations.

In short, many people are now able to become their own IT providers, leveraging only a limited set of capabilities that are uniquely available from their employers. This represents a real shift in the ‘balance of power’ between users and their IT groups, and fundamentally blurs the role and mission of many corporate IT departments. Without acknowledging and adapting to the realities of this new environment, traditional IT departments run the risk of becoming irrelevant – or even worse, a liability to their organizations.

Can Mobile Avoid The ‘New Thing’ Trap?…

Share

Back in the late 1990′s, the internet was starting to blow up into something big. Tiny companies with no revenue – but outsized ambition and fanciful business plans – started going public with astonishing valuations. More established businesses, looking on with envy, made getting on the web in some form a strategic mandate.

In those heady days, any company that wanted to be perceived as ‘hip’ started forming a digital division to manage their web presence, and advertising agencies rushed to form web consultancies to help them. Billions of dollars were spent setting up new ‘online’ divisions. It didn’t matter if what they did on the web really served a business goal – or even if had anything to do with the business they were in. It was more about flash than substance, and being digital was a virtue in and of itself. Everyone involved had a real sense of the major shift that was taking place, and no one wanted to miss out or be left behind. Even though so much of what was being done then was just bad business, it didn’t seem to matter.

At least until the crash of 2000 gave everyone a new perspective on things.

After that wake up call, businesses started reevaluating their approach to the web. It stopped being the ‘new thing’ and started becoming another tool – albeit an important one – in the suite of tools they used to service customers. Being digital shifted away from building a walled off silo of technical coolness, over to providing the technical foundation needed to support an organization’s overall business strategy. It was a tough way to learn the lesson, but the tech bubble collapse was – in retrospect – a positive turning point in the development and maturity of the commercial internet.

Unfortunately, history seems to be repeating itself in the mobile space.

Mobile is the new pillar of technical coolness. Companies are rushing to get their iPhone apps developed and approved. They are touting their ‘mobile strategies’ and setting up mobile groups to let them take advantage of this new channel. The sense of needing to be on a handset is everywhere. So many of the mobile apps being developed by businesses are poorly designed and executed, lacking the substance needed to make them valuable. But that doesn’t seem to matter because businesses are once again afraid of being left behind in the rush. Being mobile is good – no matter how it gets done.

Like the internet, mobile can be an incredibly important business asset – but only if its adopted in a rational way. Businesses need to think clearly about how and where their services can benefit from a mobile connection with their clients. They won’t win by simply showing up for the party – they need to bring something to it with real value. Mobile, like the internet, needs to become a foundational component of a fully considered business strategy – not just an expensive checkbox on a list of cool features and capabilities to deploy.

Lets hope we don’t need the ‘mobile bubble’ to burst before businesses start to see the connection.

Is Android Really Ready For Primetime?…

Share

After spending over a week on my new Android phone (Samsung Captivate Galaxy S), I can’t help but wonder if the experience I’ve been having with it is typical for other Android phone users.

The Captivate has a lot going for it – a beautiful screen, fast processor, excellent video camera, and good battery life to name a few. It just seems to me that the software – Android 2.1 – isn’t really a serious production release. There seem to be so many things with it that simply don’t function well or reliably. And some of those things are pretty significant on a smartphone:

  • The device constantly loses the settings I’ve configured for my Exchange server email. It completely forgets that the account existed on the phone and prompts me to enter a new email account as if I were starting email for the first time. I had it happen at least 7 times before I simply gave up and stopped setting it up again.
  • During those times when it did remember the account, deleting emails would be problematic. I would select a set of emails and press Delete, but still see those ‘deleted’ emails sitting there even after the app said they were removed. Sometimes they would go away if I waited a bit. Sometimes I needed to exit out of mail and then return for them to be gone.
  • The unit often becomes unresponsive if any I/O is taking place, with the touch screen remaining frozen until it finishes what it is doing. There were several times when I thought the unit had crashed on me only to have it spring back to life 20 seconds later.
  • Getting the GPS in the unit to lock on to my position is a complete crap-shoot. Sometimes it connects right away while other times I need to try repeatedly to get it to work – with both experiences happening in the same location right outside my office.

Given my lack of familiarity with Android, my initial reaction was that I was doing something wrong that was causing these things to happen. But after doing a little research to try and figure things out, I’m not so sure. It seems that I am not the only person having problem like this. Whatever the causes, I find myself in a position where I have no confidence in the device.

I had even considered returning it to AT&T for a different smartphone.

What kept me from doing that, despite the problems I’ve been having, is that I can see some real promise in the platform. It absolutely doesn’t feel completely baked or debugged to me, but I can still see glimmers of ‘something powerful’ in the software that are making me stick with it – at least until the new 2.2 FROYO version is released.

Once it’s out, I’ll do a through review of the device, and compare it in detail to my experiences using the iPhone.

And I’ll decide then for myself what I’m going to do next.

At this point, I couldn’t recommend (this) Android phone to anyone if it were the only smartphone/portable computing device they wanted to carry. The reliability just isn’t there – at least for the things I’ve been trying to do with it. If you needed to choose something right now, I think the iPhone is still the way to go – assuming you can deal with being on AT&T.

If you can wait, the best option is to see how good the Android 2.2 released ends up being, and to make your decision then.

Adding Android To The Mix…

Share

It is no secret to anyone that reads this blog regularly that I am a big fan of the iPhone. I just upgraded my personal phone to the iPhone 4, and I’m extremely happy with it. I’ve been in the iPhone camp since the very beginning – I switched off of RIM on the day the first iPhone was released, and I haven’t looked back since.

For a variety of reasons, I recently needed to get a second phone specifically for work. My initial reaction was to simply get another iPhone and carry on. But in thinking about it more, I decided it would be more interesting to go in another direction and get an Android based phone instead. I felt that this would give me the perspective I needed to better judge where Apple is going with the iPhone, as well as to get some real-world experience with with what will no doubt be the most significant competitor to iOS.

After looking around, I decided to go with the Samsung Captivate Galaxy S (also on AT&T). It seemed to have a highly regarded implementation of Android 2.1, and Samsung has committed to have an upgrade to Android 2.2 available for it when it’s rolled out.


I still have a bit to learn with the Captivate, so I’m going to hold off commenting on it in detail until I come up the curve. My initial impressions are fairly positive, with the AMOLED display, responsive touch screen, and excellent camera all toping the list of well done features. The interface lacks the polish of iOS, and it has some non-intuitive aspects that I’m going to need to figure out. The app store also has relatively slim pickings and is difficult to find new things in – definitely not impressed there at all. That said, I’m really open to having a good experience with Android – especially as 2.2 is about to be released and more development focus moves to the platform.

I’m looking forward to sharing my experiences with you as I adapt to my first non-Apple phone in a long time.

Preview of Windows Phone 7

Share

Wired Magazine put up a quick look at the technical preview version of Windows Phone 7 that Microsoft has been floating around. This video doesn’t show much in the way of details (and is a pretty lame review overall), but it does give you a general sense of the thinking and flow behind their new UI design:

With the caveat that I haven’t actually played with the new phone myself, I’m left with the impression that the ’tiles’ design of Microsoft’s latest mobile OS – what they call the “Metro” UI – is going to require a lot of scrolling around – especially if you have a lot of applications you normally work with. For better or worse, Windows Phone 7 is clearly not another iPhone knockoff – something I do give Microsoft props for. It is approaching the phone as a social tool, and weaving all forms of communication you have with people together into a cohesive stream anchored by the people you connect with instead of through discrete services.

That said, I just don’t have a good feeling about this. I’m getting the sense that Microsoft is getting the spin machine started up early – never a good sign. No amount of PR is going to save this phone if it fails to deliver, and the competition is only getting tougher the longer it takes for them to release it. Their ambitions and focus seem to be in the right place, but the OS will need to translate that into something that is easy for people to understand and use in real world set ups and situations.

Train wreck, wild success, or something in between, with Microsoft’s entire mobile strategy riding on this new OS, it’s definitely worth keeping an eye on.

Once I get to spend some time with it, I’ll post something more detailed on the specific pros and cons I see – stay tuned…